BETWEEN BANKER’S WINDOW DRESSING AND INVASION OF SCHOLAR WANNABES

BETWEEN BANKER’S WINDOW DRESSING AND INVASION OF SCHOLAR WANNABES

Zulkifli Hasan

Shari’ah scholars in Islamic finance are frequently put in a dilemma position. They have been accused upside down with numerous allegations even without any basis. During early implementation of Islamic finance, Shari’ah scholars have been alleged as forming an alliance with Islamic capitalist to create a new market for Islamic finance sector. In this instance, the Islamic banks are guided by those well-paid clerics and always issue rulings according to their needs. In fact, since 1980s, many of the scholars have been accused of being bankers’ window dressing and of over-stretching the rules of Shari’ah to provide easy fatwas to Islamic financial institutions.

Lately, it is quite surprising that the scholars have been criticized even by Islamic bankers. The myth of alliance between Islamic bankers and Shari’ah scholars seems to be no longer relevant. One of the critics refers to allegation where the Islamic financial market globally has been invaded by Shari’ah scholar wannabes, a new term introduced to refer to the so called unqualified Shari’ah scholars. This Shari’ah scholar wannabes have infiltrated Islamic banks, regulatory authorities and Shari’ah governing bodies without due consideration to stakeholders value. Much more serious is where the criticism includes allegation of changing the meaning of Quranic verses and Hadith by those Shari’ah scholar wannabes.

Caution and criticism are mostly welcomed and in fact warranted but not to baseless allegation and wrongful accusation. Constructive criticisms particularly on the governance issue in Islamic financial institutions will surely contribute to the development of Islamic finance industry. The unethical criticisms will lead the industry nowhere and in fact will infiltrate its development and negate the public confidence. Considering the significance of this issue, this article attempts to address several misconceptions on Islamic finance even by the so called truly Islamic finance practitioners with the aim of providing a basic understanding and removing any inaccurate or unfounded prejudice.

1. Islamic finance is a pure commercial transaction: Islamic finance concept is grounded in ethics, values and norms. As Islamic finance is not pure commercial transaction and not only confine to nominate contracts, Islamic financial institutions therefore should be commercially and morally oriented entities. Islamic finance assumes a moral based value preposition which offers solution for the economic and financial problems. These moral and ethical value systems require that the decision-making process in Islamic finance must not solely based on efficiency and equity but must have social and ethical dimensions.

2. Stakeholders value confines to shareholders interest: The stakeholder value orientation is not only concern on shareholders but also to protect all the stakeholders’ interest and rights. The stakeholders value, conceptually, require Islamic financial institutions to balance the corporate goal of maximizing the profit with the duty to uphold the principle of social justice and maqasid Shari’ah and this entails the notion of protecting the interests and rights of all stakeholders within the Shari’ah rules. Even the Basel Committee for Banking Supervision on ‘Enhancing Corporate Governance for Banking Organizations’, expands the term ‘stakeholders’ to include employees, customers, depositors, suppliers, supervisors, government and the community. Not only that the OECD further classifies the stakeholders into shareholders, internal stakeholders (employees and labour unions), operational partners (customers, suppliers, creditors and contractors), and the social community (state authorities, trade union, non-governmental organizations and civil society).

3. The true meaning of Bay is sale and it has no element of risk: Islamic finance is gharar-free, maysir-free and riba-free, but not risk-free. Since Islamic financial products and services are designed based on different nominate contracts, it is erroneous and would be a sheer misconception to say that Islamic finance is risk-free or less risky. Furthermore, Islamic financial products and services should have moral and ethical dimensions and therefore any transactions should be embedded in real economy which offers an alternative financing paradigm. At this point, the conceptual framework of Islamic finance suggests that it should be more than financialisation of the nominate contracts. Islamic financial institutions should take necessary risks equitably and not simply shifting the liability unfairly to the customer. In other words, Islamic finance should represent a holistic approach to financing not only bankable customer but also to allocate certain fund for non-bankable and underprivileged people as part of its social responsibility to the society and ummah.

4. Islamic financial institutions are purely profit-oriented entities: Based on its epistemological dimension, Islamic finance is actually a society oriented financing proposition as it aims to serve the community, ummah and not solely to the markets. Islamic finance must not only confine within profit-driven orientation but it should also address issues on economic and sustainable development, social justice and social investing oriented principles. With reference to several empirical studies, the current Islamic finance practices on the other hand do not indicate positive correlation with human development index scores. Surprisingly, the corporate social responsibility performance of Islamic financial institutions also has been rather weak and poor as compared to its conventional counterpart. This position demands Islamic financial institutions to seriously reevaluate and review their current practices and future direction.

5. Shari’ah scholar wannabes infiltrated the industry’s well being: The critics on the roles of Shari’ah scholars are always blown out of proportion and over-exaggerated. Undeniably, Shari’ah scholars, either senior or young scholars or conservative or pragmatic scholars have their own unique contribution to the industry’s well being but their approaches may be different. This should not be the reason of denying their significant contribution. The ‘Conservative’ scholars may view the legitimacy of Islamic financial products and services to be based on the legal and mechanistic aspects of Shari’ah. The products and services are classified as lawful and Shari’ah-compliant or Shariʿah-based if they meet the conditions of a valid muamalat transaction after going through the ordinary process of usul al fiqh. On the other hand, the ‘Pragmatic’ scholars admit that Islamic finance should not confine their function by solely emphasizing the fiqh aspect. The ‘Pragmatic’ scholars acknowledged that Islamic financial products and services should not only be valid and lawful, must fulfil the spirit of maqasid Shariʿah but must also be ethical and uphold the Islamic values.

The critics upon Shari’ah scholars of either being banker’s window dressing or invasion of the scholar wannabes are actually misleading. These allegations to certain extent will negatively influence the Islamic finance industry as they are not supported with any empirical evidence. Rather than discussing these unnecessary issues, the Islamic finance discourse should actually be focusing on its fundamental principles and how to ensure its sustainability. It is important to critically evaluate the performance of Islamic financial institutions against their foundational base and at the same time to maintain its positive development. The existing practices of Islamic finance so far have failed to establish a distinct identity or to draw a clear demarcation line with conventional banks. In fact, with several corporate failures of Islamic financial institutions, such as the closures of Ihlas Finance House in Turkey, the Islamic Bank of South Africa and the Islamic Investment Companies of Egypt, and corporate difficulties, as in the case of the Dubai Islamic Bank, and Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad, Islamic finance is clearly not immune from the crisis. Islamic finance must learn from the history and take lesson from previous financial crisis. We do not want to hear that the only lesson that Islamic financial institutions have learned is that they never learn.

Disclaimer: This is the personal opinion of the author.

Regards

Zulkifli Hasan
P1080339
Grand Mosque of Cordova

One thought on “BETWEEN BANKER’S WINDOW DRESSING AND INVASION OF SCHOLAR WANNABES

  1. Dawud says:

    Nice read… just curious… how are the differences of opinions with regards to issues relating to the Shariah / Fiqh dealt with in Malaysia or other countries in relation to Islamic Finance ?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s