Bank Negara Malaysia Shariah Advisory Council given 90-day deadline to revert

Bank Negara Malaysia SAC given 90-day deadline to revert

Habhajan Singh Available at: http://themalaysianreserve.com/main/sectorial/islamic-finance/5660-bank-negara-malaysia-sac-given-90-day-deadline-to-revert

Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) has given itself a 90-day deadline to revert to the courts or arbitrators when asked to provide Shariah advice on Islamic financial matters.

This is mentioned in the recently published manual for courts and arbitrators on how to refer to the Shariah Advisory Council in Islamic Finance (SAC) of the central bank which is available on the BNM website.

In the document dated Feb 10, the SAC takes note its task was only to ascertain the Islamic law relating to issues raised by the courts or the arbitrators.

“The SAC does not have the jurisdiction to make findings of fact or to apply a law on the facts and make a decision, whether on a certain issue or for the case at hand because those matters are within the jurisdiction of the court or arbitrator,” it says.

This is in line with the Central Bank of Malaysia Act 2009. Section 51 (1) of the act states the central bank ‘may establish a Shariah Advisory Council on Islamic Finance which shall be the authority for the ascertainment of Islamic law for the purposes of Islamic financial business’.

One of the functions of the SAC is, as per Section 52 (1), to ’ascertain the Islamic law on any financial matter and issue a ruling upon reference made to it’.

The recent manual lays out the processes for referral from the courts of law or abitration as provided under Section 56 of the same act.

Section 56 (1) states: ‘Wherein any proceedings relating to Islamic financial business before any court or arbitrator any question arises concerning a Shariah matter, the court or the arbitrator, as the case may be, shall — (a) take into consideration any published rulings of the Shariah Advisory Council; or (b) refer such question to the Shariah Advisory Council for its ruling’.

The manual says when referring a Shariah matter to the SAC, the court or the arbitrator is first required to refer to its published decisions.

They can also contact the SAC secretariat on their initial enquries or to get further information on the earlier decisions.

The manual also provides guidance as to the kind of matters that can be referred to the SAC.

It states, in point No 5, that only Shariah-related matters arising in a court proceeding related to Islamic finance business should be referred to the SAC.

In the next point, the document deals with what constitutes Shariah, falling back to a definition decided at the SAC meeting on Oct 19, 2011. It states: “Questions on Islamic law for matters related to Islamic finance that involves subjects that have or have yet to be ruled on by the SAC. Those questions include, but are not limited to, Islamic finance business aspects like business structure, products or services, implementation or operations, terms and conditions or documentation.”

The above is a translation of the original document which is in Malay, with the English version yet to be published.

On the effects of the Shariah rulings, Section 57 of the same act above states that SAC rulings made in reference of the courts or the arbitrators ‘shall be binding on the Islamic financial institutions’.

Regards
Zulkifli Hasan

P1170945
Tokyo

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s